As a starting point for evaluating websites, one might use the part of the web address immediately after the "dot" (for example, .com) to try to determine the reliability of the information.
URL |
Type |
Purpose |
---|---|---|
.com |
Commercial sites |
Typically trying to sell products or make money through ads. |
.org |
Organizations, usually non-profit |
Often have agendas, try to influence opinion, wide range of credibility |
.edu |
Educational Institutions |
College and university information, libraries |
.gov |
Government Agencies |
Statistics, public information, facts |
Limit your Google search to .gov or .edu sites by adding site:.edu or site:.gov after your search terms:
This image provides a useful framework for evaluating the credibility and reliability of information sources, known as the ABCD method. It suggests considering four key factors: Author, Bias, Content, and Date. Author: Identify the author or organization responsible for the information. Check the author's credentials and whether they can be verified. Note the website's domain extension (.edu, .gov, .com, .org, etc.) as an indicator of the source type. Bias: Determine if more than one viewpoint or opinion is expressed. Assess whether the information is presented as fact or opinion. Examine the site's purpose (to inform, entertain, persuade, or sell). Watch for emotionally charged language that may indicate bias. Content: Evaluate how thoroughly the topic is covered. Consider the presentation level (elementary, high school, college, etc.). Look for references or citations that support the information provided. Date: Check when the site was last updated. Determine if the information is still valid or outdated. By considering these factors, readers can critically analyze information sources and make informed judgments about their credibility, objectivity, and relevance to their research or information needs.